==========================================================================

- 1 -

G L ( ) B /\ L N E W S

FDA SWAT TEAM SEIZES GASTON NAESSENS INFORMATION

Denial of the freedom of thought and speech has apparently become an element of the FDA's drive to regulate medicine in the U.S.A. In July, and FDA SWAT team invaded teh New York offices of a publishing company to seize information concerning the use of an unapproved material as a cancer treatment.

Materials seized from Writers and Research, Inc. of Rochester, NY, included books and booklets on a controversial camphor-based treatment for cancer called 714X, developed by Gaston Naessens. Also seized was computer equipment, a seizure justified by an agent because it was "used to print information on a substance that is banned in the US". The drug itself was not the target of the raid-only information about it, as well as files of people who had expressed interest in it.

Writers and Research had contacted the FDA in the process of obtaining approval to import 714X into the United States. Towards this end, the company had constituted an Institutional Review Board to examine the claims made for 714X, a step necessary to gaining FDA approval. This had been done two months prior to the FDA raid. The FDA had not disqualified this board, but had prohibited any reference to its findings before approval.

In Short, the FDA raided a company prior to that company achieving its stated desire of gaining approval for an alternative medicine. They did not raid to seize medicine. They raided to stop dissemination of information about that medicine.

(Source: After Hours, July-Sept 1994, Box 5636, Colorado Springs, CO 80931, USA)

**************************************

BIG BROTHER & CLINTON'S HEALTH SECURITY ACT

Clinton's health care plan ensures that everyone has access to medical care- and ravages the Bill of Rights in the process. If one reads the 1342 page Health Security Act, as Jarret Wollstein did, one wonders what Machiavellian mind devised it. Jarret WOllstein, Director of the International Society for Individual Liberty and co-author of Lethal Compassion: WHy National Health Care is the Cure that Kills, explained in an interview published by The Financial Privacy Report (May 1994) how Clinton's health care bill affects freedom of choice and medical privacy.

FIrst, Clinton's plan states that everyone "must enroll" in a government-run health alliance and "must pay any premium required". The health premium is actually a payroll tax of 7.6% of the pay cheque, which is about equal to the amount removed from employees' cheques for Social Security. Imagine trying to survive on a minimum wage with another 7.6% taken out. Where is the incentive to work if the pay cheque at the end of the month can't begin to pay for food and housing? The amount of this "premium" is set by the local health alliance and a politically appointed National Health Board at their discretion. No ceiling amound has been set. Self-employed people who refuse to pay or can't afford to pay are fined three times the amount of premium, or US$5,000, whichever is higher. If they don't pay, the government has the right to seize their assets. In other words, we hav eno choice but to pay for this plan, whether we want it or not. We don't even get to vote on it.

But all of us will get the health care we want or need under this plan, right? Wrong. As Wollstein points out, approximately 37 million more people will have access to clinics and doctors. To regulate the increased flow, government "gatekeepers" no patients, not doctors-willdecide who gets in to see a doctor or into a hospital. Anyone who tries to bypass the health plan and use his or her own money to pay for covered medical services faces 15 years imprisonment and fines up to US$50,000-that is, if you can find a doctor willing to risk the same penalties.

Under the Health Security Act, the Department of Justice also has the right to confiscate anything you own if you are accused, not necessarily convicted, of threatening the health of anyone or having a "significant detrimental impact on the health care system". Curiously, no monies have been budgeted to fund this new policing bureau. In its own self-interest, the bureau will have to be zealous in its confiscation of property.

Finally, Clinton's Health Security Bill forbids doctors from withholding information about their patients from the government; medical privacy will no longer be honored. Doctors can be fined up to US$10,000 per violation, without trial. This information, according to the health act, can be used for any "lawful purpose", and the National Health Board is authorized to get other information about individuals from any other government agency, including the ISR. Why does a health board need such powers?

The abridgement of freedom and righst in this Health Security Act is too high a price to pay for universal health care. Congress apparently agrees. Senate Bill 1227 exempts members of Congress and all federal employees from any national health care plan. If they don't want it, why should we?

(Source: Compiled by Jule Klotter for TOWNSEND LETTER FOR DOCTORS, November 1994, from The Financial Privacy Report, Box 1277, Burnsville MN 55337, USA)

*************************************

WILL MOBILE PHONES BECOME MOBILE ID TAGS?

Not many people realise that the technology exists to track a person's whereabouts from their mobile phone handset via certain types of satellites.

The next step in our technological 'evolution' from the consumer's point of view is that virtually everyone will have their own personal mobile phone, with their own personal mobile phone ID number. Each of these mobile phone handsets emits a virtually continous signal which is picked up by satellite or ground tower and relayed on. It is rumoured that most handsets emit this signal even when the power is turned off. It is any Big Brother's dream come true in terms of knowing where everyone is at any time.

It was announced in UK newspapers recently that by 1988, mobile phones will go global. Your handset will give you access to a satellite based system that will allow calls to be made pracctically anywhere on Earth.

"Iridium, a consortium of 17 major companies led by Motorola, proposes to launch 66 satellites in orbits corssing both poles, ensuring a satellite will fly over every spot on Earth at least once every nine minutes. Any any one time at least three satellites will be in view, enabling the handset's precise position to be located."

(Source: The Weekly Telegraph (UK), no 173,2-8 November 1994)

******************************************

CANADIAN NEO-NAZI GROUP CREATED BY BRITAIN'S MI5?

Canada's government-appointed intelligence watchdog group is investigating allegations that the Canadian Secret Intelligence Service (CSIS), the counterpart of Britain's MI5, founded and steered Canada's main neo-Nazi organization, Heritage Front.

These allegations are also made in a book, titled The Ugly Truth about the ADL, which uncovers most neo-Nazi provocateurs as a completely controlled international product of British intelligence operations in North America and elsewhere, with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) playing a special starring role.

According to the Toronto Sun, one Grant Bristow organised the Heritage Front whiilst in receipt of $50,000 per year from the CSIS, and then "threw himself into running a small unit of the front that specialised in dirty-tricks campaigns against anti-racists" by infiltrating such groups and setting them up against each other.

The tactics of creating an imaginary enemy to justify funding are not rare. Take the recent case of US mayoral hopeful, Donald Mintz. He produced and distrubited disgusting anti-Jewish leaflets and then appealed to the Jewish community for campaign funds to fight the racists. In this case a local reporter caught him in the act and dashed all hopes of being elected.

(Source: The New Citizen, Oct-Nov 1994)

*************************************

OXYGEN THERAPIES UNDER ATTACK IN THE UK

In Australia they're called the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration); in America they're called the FDA (Food & Drug Administration); and in the UK they're called the MCA (Medicines Control Agency). But no matter where they are or what they are called, they all have an agenda to restrict public access to "unauthorised" health care treatments.

The British medical bureaucracy, like its counterpart in Australia and the US has decided that the increasing number of success stories emerging from the use of oxygen therapies has to stop.

In June of last year the Ministry of Health 'visited' the offices of Echo UK, a non-profit oxygen therapies information centre involved only in the dissemination of public domain literature. They had a warrant signed by no less than the Minister of Health, Mrs Virginia Bottomley, giving them authority to inspect all files and literature. Echo UK was informed (incorrectly) that they were breaking the law by distributing some of the information in their possession.

Pressure from the MCA and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain was also applied to Echo UK, all in an attempt to stop them from distributing already publicly available information.

I suppose, though, the British should consider themselves lucky. I mean, they only get polite gentlemen bearing a warrant to inspect files and literature, while in the USA they send in an armed SWAT team with fully-loaded automatic weapons and wearing flak jackets, who kick the door down, steal everything and then trash the place while holding staff and patients at gunpoint against the wall.

(Source: Echo UK, 13 Albert Road, Retford, Nottinghamshire DN22 6JD, UK; phone +44 0777 71 0292, fax +44 0777 86 0737)

*****************************************

COLD WAR CON?

When presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and George Bush signed an agreement in 1991 to take all Soviet and US nuclear bombers off alert and put the warheads into storage, it was celebrated as a breakthrough.

But according to an item in the London Sunday Times, the two presidents were merely formalising a secret 'arrangement' that had existed for decades.

The truth emerged when the deputy head of Russia's Strategic Air Force, Major General Anatoli Solovyov, revealed that for safety reasons, "we never flew within nuclear weapons, inly with imitations".

Similarly, the US Strategic Bomber Fleet was largely grounded after a couple of accidents in the 1960s. (Four nuclear weapons fell from a B-52 bomber off Palomares, Spain, in 1966; and in 1968, a B-52 crashed near the Thule Air Force Base in Greenland with four nuclear bombs on board.) After 1967, all the bombers in the US Strategic Fleet were grounded until the end of the Cold War.

(Source: The Sunday Times (UK), Sunday Star-Times (NZ), 10 July 1994)

**************************************

UN TREATIES - NEW WORLD ORDER BY STEALTH?

Australians are beginning to wake up to the fact that the Federal Government has been very busy making Australia a co-signatory to literally thousands of international treaties. United Nations treates, with irresistible names such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), are usually signed without as much as a whisper to the public for debate.

When Governor-General Bill Hayden signed the abovementioned ICCPR on 25th December 1991, he hadn't counted on the public uproar that would ensue. Tens of thousands of people phoned and wrote to politicians complaining that the bill was a defacto Bill of Rights being imposed upon all Australians by an unelected faceless UN committee in another country.

The following December, the Governor General was asked to ratify a treaty (ILO158) only hours before the dissolution of Parliament. No media release was issued. There was no public debate.

The latest example of the effects of UN treateis upon Australian citizens' rights is of course the homosexual rights issue in Tasmania. Here we have an island state in a democracy where many of the people seem to want the law to stay the way it is. However, it says in one of the several thousand treaties we have signed that this law is not acceptable. It is a pity that the Federal Government did not tell the people of Tasmania this when they signed the treaty in the first place-or was that the general idea?

The following extract is worth reading in light of the above: 'The remarkable growth of international laws had led countries including Australia to surrender parts of their sovereignty to the world community, the former Governor-General of Australia, Sir Ninian Stephen, said last night.

Sir Ninian, chairman of the foundation examining Australia's Constitution, said that international justice and peace would only come by adherence to such laws, of which there are now over 50,000.

His views, expressed at the opening of the International Bar Association converence in Melbourne, echoed those of former Prime Minister, Mr Goug Whitlam.

Mr Whitlam said recently that it was crucial for Canberra to introduce world standards such as United Nations and International Labour Organisation and not be deterred by State's rights.

The 50,000 new international instuments, treaties and conventions formed over the past few decades are administered by more than 2,000 new international agencies and instrmentalities, said Sir Ninian.

"The result has been in every country a plethora of new laws appearing on the statute book, giving local effect ot newly assumed international obligations," he said.

Countries have voluntarily surrendered parts of their sovereignty in the cause of interdependence and cooperation.

"It will surely only be by the extension of international law throughout the nations and its universal observance that they (countries) will come to live together at peace and in justice as one world communitiy."

(Sources: Inside News, February 1992; The Australian, 17 August 1994, 10 October 1994)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 2 -

NEW WORLD ORDER in the U.S.A.

Written By The P/\NTHER -UMF/TRSi-

This country is just one step away from total disarmament and a One-World police-controlled Economic Government!

The Civil War, WW I, WW II, the Korean Conflict, VietNam, Desert Storm, the Randy Weaver incident, the Waco situation, Somalia, Bosnia, etc. were purposely imposed on the peoples of the world to condition them to be controlled by a few self-appointed rulers.

In 1913, the U.S. Congress relinquished its responsibility regarding our money system by allowing the "private" Federal Reserve System to be established and controlled by the Illuminati (the hidden government consisting of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers, which are headed up by the Rockefellers in the United States and by the Rothschilds of Europe) and its "stockholders." (Trilateralism is international economic regionalism dealing with INTERdependence, and not a final goal. It is a precursor to the one-world government being planned for humanity by the international cartelists vain enough to think they are destined to rule over a slave humanity, despite the wishes and rights of mankind.)

Also, in 1913, the Congress allowed the Internal Revenue Service (Title 26) to operate under the "color of law." Title 26 has never been enacted into law by Congress.

In 1921, the CFR saw its birth, to be joined soon thereafter by the TC - both Rockefeller institutions and headquartered in New York as is the United Nations.

In 1945, the United States, through constant promoting from the U.S. State Department, signed the United Nations Charter, overriding our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

In 1961, the former President Nixon signed Executive Order 11647 (precursor towards acceptance of NAFTA a Treaty). This E.O. divided the U.S. into ten federal regions to be run by "Federal Regional Councils" (over 18 states have since rejected Regionalism, but who is listening?). (School children are being groomed to accept Regional Government - look at the back of the small KIX Cereal box at your local grocery stores.)

The lines drawn for these federal regions cross State lines, thus obliterating the sovereignty of the States. Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution declares:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government..."

A republican form of government is defined in Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary as one in which "the sovereign power resides in a certain body of the people--the electorate--and is exercised by representatives elected by, and responsible to, them."

Under the Federal Regional Councils proclaimed by President Nixon, government in the ten federal regions would be administered by federal-appointed bureaucrats accountable only to Washington, D.C. Nixon's actions are a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1, which stipulates:

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new STate shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor any State be formed by the junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."

Nixon did not obtain the consent of all the State Legislatures concerned, nor of Congress. At the time of signing E.O. 11647, Nixon included the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA). The LEAA is becoming increasingly involved in dishing out taxpayers' dollars to finance programs of merger, consolidation and regionalization of local police forces. (When a national police force becomes a recognized, accepted, operating reality, it will no longer be ineffective and permissive; it will be ruthlessly efficient and repressive.)

Establishment of LEAA is a crucial first step to a national police force. President Clinton recently announced he is making $22 billion available to upgrade all states' police forces (with a few more prisons thrown in for good measure); there are strings attached to it - any time the federal government has an input, it controls.

The "hidden" government (CFR/TC/Bilderbergers, etc) to which nearly all State Department officials belong, as well as many other appointed and elected positions of our government (to include Congressmen and Senators), is using the Communist technique of discrediting the local police in the eyes of the people. A national police force with unlimited powers is one of the most important characteristics of a totalitarian dictatorship. The plot against local control of the police has been in the making for some time. A national police force would take from the States the responsibility of enforcing laws that should remain in their jurisdiction. Law-abiding citizens and local officials should vigorously oppose concerted attacks against local law enforcement and the devious moves to negate local authority and replace it with federal police power. There are many SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL POLICE COMMITTEES operating throughout the country. With the passing of the Brady Gun Bill, another step towards total disarmament and elimination of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If the American people permit a national police force to be established, no citizen will be permitted to have a gun in his possession to defend himself and his family against this planned tyranny. The Brady Gun Bill becomes "law" 90 days after its signing - so come March 1994, or even before, more stringent gun control bills will either be signed into law or on the drawing board. Those communities know to encourage at least one gun ownership per household have far less crime. Statistics prove gun control increases crime - criminals become more arrogant, they know our present justice system is "soft" on them; it is the law-abiding citizen who is prosecuted/persecuted.

In between all the above actions to dissolve America, the presidents have instituted Executive Orders which give one man, the president, total control over all our lives in these United States of America!

In 1984, former President Reagan conditionally agreed to Total Disarmament of the United States of America which would automatically include Total Gun Confiscation - private citizens especially !

In 1989, 400 Congressmen signed into law P.L. 101-216, which reinforces P.L. 87-297 and State Department Document #7277. (Approximately 33 California Congressmen signed this P.L. - those still holding public office include: Paneta, Boxer, Dellums, Beilenson, Berman, Dornan, Dreier, Thomas, Fazio, Lantos, Lehman, Matsui, McCandless, Mineta, Moorhead, Packard, Pelosi, J. Lewis, Stark, Rohrabacher, Torres, Waxman and others - and former Cong. Dannemeyer who hopes to unseat Senator Feinstein in 1994.)

In 1994 the Crime Control Act was passed (which will further remove many of our freedoms and inalienable rights under the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights), the National Health Care Act (Socialized Medicine, which will impose additional restrictions on the people), Goals 200 (total control of our children, through Federal Government schools), etc. All of these "programs" will impose additional taxes on the general public.

The National Education Association (NEA) is listed as a participating organization in the National Coalition to Ban Handguns. The NEA's chief commitment is to promote a planned society which will train children to disregard the traditional values of their parents, preparing them to adjust to, and support, growing collectivism. The NEA is a tax-exempt organization -- meaning that you help pay for its programs, to include your own disarmament.

Emerging throughout our nation is the Fully Informed Jury ASsociation whose doctrine is to insure "fully informed jurists" in our court rooms 0 many judges prohibit proper indoctrination of juries.

Every step the U.S. takes toward political and economic entanglements with the rest of the world is a step toward realization of the end object of the CFR, the TC, the Bilderbergers, etc., which is to create a one-world socialist, political and economic system in which we (the U.S.) will be one of the subjugated provinces. So, now we have the illegally passed NAFTA; read Article II, Sec. 2, Para. 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

World government would seriously impair if not totally destroy the national sovereignty of the United States of America. Loss of a national sovereignty means not only the loss of the power to control the destiny of a nation, it also means the loss of the rights of the individual citizens in that nation. One of the direct links between the CFR and the "big business" community is the Committee for Economic Development (CED). The CFR is geared to control our foreign policy (which it has been doing since its inception in 1921, regardless of what party represents the White House); the CED concerns itself with domestic policy of this country. It is the #1 priority of the CFR and CED to nullify the power of the individual States, leaving them at the mercy of the all-powerful federal government, a government controlled by men belonging to the CFR and the CED (as well as the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberger Group).

The Rockefellers have been working for five decades to control the American government so they can dominate our economy...

The Rockefeller game plan is to consolidate control over the world's economies by merging all the nations of the world under a single Rockefeller/Rothschild-controlled tent. Such a government would have to be a dictatorship, ruled by Rockefeller and Rothschild puppets or by the Communist-Third World bloc. It was Rockefeller money (9$ million) that paid for the ground on which the United Nations stands. It is Rockefeller money and the money of the many (over 1600) tax-exempt Foundations (to include Ford and Carnegie) that bankroll this nation's dash into One-Worldly/Feudalism.

It looks like it could be too late to fight such an awesome network of power. But then again Information is the weapon THEY are afraid of.

"Keep your eyes & ears open & your mouth shut & you'll learn something."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 3 -

MOONGATE : Chapter 10

Evidence of Extraterrestrial interference in the space program.

The UFO subject has been abused by many writers who produce books about UFOs with seemingly little thought or hard analysis. Hopefully, information contained in the remainder of this book will help explain certain aspects of the UFO enigma in a more logical manner. This requires a better understanding of how the universe functions and man's position in it. Every phenomenon must have a rational basis, regardless of how bizarre it may seem to be. In every case, the law of cause and effect must hold. If NASA fabricated information, it will show up as a fabrication when it contradicts other valid occurrences. The sum total of all phenomena must boil down to the real picture of what happened.

Logic dictates that if UFOs occupied by intelligent beings are close by, they must have a purpose in being here. If these beings are around, actions taken by Earth people will probably be closely monitored by them. The human beings who live on the outer surface of the Earth have an extremely bad reputation for being killers. Historians can rationalize the wars based on this or that reason; however, from the standponit of advanced civilizations which are not part of the outer Earth world, the Earth's history would be appalling. How could UFO occupants trust Earth nations to be benevolent when these nations have such war-filled histories and are developing weapons which are more and more powerful?

A great deal of information exists about Earth people who claim to have been contacted by "space" people. Many of these contactees have allegedly been told that the Earth is being carefully monitored. The primary reason given for the monitoring is so that they will be able to quickly curtail a nuclear war should it begin. If this is true, then missiles and spacecraft would be closely observed to ensure that they carried no nuclear warheads and did no damage to the EArth or Moon. Therefore, if UFO encounters or sightings were made byt he astronauts, it should come as no surprise. This would be especially true during the Apollo missions if these people are stationed on the Moon. The present discussion will focus on the evidence of extraterrestrials inadvertently supplied by NASA and other lunar observers. Contactee encounters will be discussed in the next chapter.

Centuries ago, lunar observers noted transient phenomena which could not be easily attributed to natural causes. For example, small dome-like upswellings have appeared and disappeared on the Moon. In 1788, the astronomer Schroeter attributed these domes to the industrial activities of the Selenite (Moon) people. (1) Naturally, he was not taken seriously. However, over 200 of these white, circular domes have been observed and catalogued in current times. (2) These hemispheres have varied in diameter between an eighth and a quarter of a mile, with an average of one-quarter; and between 20 and 30 of them of similar size were seen clustered on the floor of Tycho Crater. (3) These particular domes can not be attributed solely to rounded hills or volcanic upswellings. Their unpredictable appearance and disappearance indicates that they are intelligently created and movable structures.

Schroeter saw a shadow in the lunar Alps in 1788. (4) At first he saw a light, but after the region had been illuminated, a round shadow appeared where the light had been. Since the shadow was round, the object which produced it was detached and above the lunar surface. After 15 minutes, is supposedly disappeared. It is possible that Schroeter saw a large aerial object which provided the illumination to create its own shadow. Many bright, round spots have also been sighted inside craters such as Plato and the Sea of Crisis. They frequently appear dome-like and change their brightness from night to night. (5)

George Leonard supplied photographic evidence that the Moon is being worked with massive machines in his book, Somebody Else Is on the Moon. He suggested that damage done to the Moon's surface at one time is slowly being repaired. He claims to have photographic evidence which shows craters being worked on and perhaps mined. It is now known that the Moon is rich in valuable elements which could be used for many purposes.

The evidence of extraterrestrial monitoring of the space program apparently began with the Mercury missions and continued through Apollo 17. During Cooper's fourth orbit over Hawaii in 1963, he heard a weird voice transmission in an unintelligible language. The tapes were later analyzed and it was determined that the sounds were not those of any known foreign language on the Earth. (6) On the final orbit near Australia, he sighted a UFO from the space capsule. (7) It was also allegedly seen by over 200 people at the tracking station. (8)

Supposedly one or more UFOs were seen on each of the 12 Gemini missions. After the 1966 Gemini 9 mission was scrubbed due to interference with the radio hookup, NASA released a statement on television that UFOs or unknowns had been seen by astronauts on several occasions. (9)

White and McDivitt saw and photographed an eggshaped, glowing, silvery object which moved above and below them. Five frames with a movie camera were taken as it flew by, and the film shows an egg-shaped object with a fan-like glow and a long tail of light. The Mission Control report stated that Command Pilot Jim McDivitt reported seeing another object in space which appeared to have big arms sticking out. The report also indicated that he took some motion pictures of the object, but had difficulty because of the Sun. (10)

It is significant that Gemini 7 encountered a UFO and many little particles traveling by the space capsule. The silvery UFO was not the rocket booster because it was seen in addition to the UFO. (11) NASA commonly attributed the particles observed in other missions to urine droplets or paint fragments peeling off the spacecraft.

John Glen was the first astronaut to discover the "fireflies" which were observed quite frequently throughout the space program. After he had moved out of the night side of his first orbit, he glanced back through the window and thought that the spacecraft had tumbled because he saw "stars." Glenn soon realized that the spacecraft had not tumbled and that he was surrounded by yellowish-green, luminous particles which looked like "fireflies." They appeared to vary in size between a pinhead and three-eights of an inch and were eight to ten feet apart, evely distributed through the space around the capsule. Each time the Sun came up, he observed these particles for about four minutes. Glenn stated the following about them:

"During the third sunrise I turned the spacecraft around and faced forward to see if I could determine where the particles were coming from. Facing forwards I could see only about ten percent as many particles as I had when my back was to the sun. Still, they seemed to be coming toward me from some distance so that they appeared not to be coming from the spacecraft. Just what these particles are is stil subject to debate and awaits further clarification." (12)

In spite of Glenn's clear statement that these particles did not come from the spacecraft, orthodox authorities atributed them to flakes of material coming off the capsule.

Although more UFO sightings could be reference involving the Gemini missions, the most valuable information came from the Apollo flights. In going around the Moon, Apollo 8 astronauts supposedly sighted a "disc-shaped" object, experienced a "blinding light", and herd "intolerably high-frequency noises" from their radio. (13) Later, they sighted the object again with more of the brilliant light and experienced "a wave of internal heat within the space capsule." (14) The spacecraft supposedly began to "pitch and yaw" before control was regained. (15) It is also significant that when the astronauts came around theeastern edge of the Moon, all the water in a radiator in the spacecraft's cooling system had evaporated and had to be replenished! (16)

According to official accounts, Apollo 10 had a close call when Cernan and Stafford descended to within 50,000 feet of the lunar surface to inspect the APollo 11 landing site. It seems that after the descent stage was jettisoned, the upper stage went into a wild spin, pitching up and down. Something caused the gyro-guidance system to go out of control, and to steady the ship, Stafford took over the hand controls. Supposedly, a control switch had beee left in the wrong position by technicians and was not spotted by Stafford. However, official accounts do not mention that a UFO rose vertically from below and that it was photographed. (17)

The first Apollo 11 UFO encounter occurred one day into the flight. The astronauts sighted an unknown which appeared between them and the Moon which might have been the booster rocket. In the debriefing, Aldrin stated that they recalled having trouble with the high gain at about the same time as the sighting. Coolins mentioned that they felt a bump and Armstrong indicated that Collins thought the MESA (Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly) had come off. Aldrin then recalled seeing all sorts of little objects going by prior to seeing the brighter object which had an L-shape to it. Armstrong compared it to two connected rings, but Aldrin disagreed and described it as a hollow cylinder. Collins re-entered the conversation and asserted that it looked like a hollow cylinder which was tumbling, but would change to an open-book shape. (18)

There are some significant items of information in the above conversation. First of all, Aldrin stated that they wer having a problem with the high gain about the time of the sighting. Collins mentioned that they felt a bump, but then decided against this idea after Armstrong commented on the MESA package. As the dialogue progresed, the astronauts began talking about the shape of the object. It seems that these three, trained observers could not or would not agree on what they saw. Each man seemed to have a picture of what it was, yet after Collins explicitly described it as a cylinder, Aldrin stated that it was not a cylinder. Armstrong said that it looked like two connected rings.

When Apollo 11 was near the Moon, weird radio noises were heard which sounded like fire engines, sirens, buxx-saws, and train whistles. Mission Control supposedly asked if someone else was up there with them. These signals or noises came from outside the spacecraft and also allegedly persisted intermittently throughout the first few days of the flight. (19)

According to one undisclosed source, after Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the Moon, immense UFOs lined up on the far side of the crater and monitored the astronauts. (20) Another reference to this event appeared in the National Enquirer, September 11, 1979. (21) In the story, a formber consultant to NASA claims that the event occurred but was covered up. According to the article, the encounter was common knowledge in NASA.

The reader is reminded that some of this information is limited and perhaps questionable concerning the subject matter of NASA UFO sightings. If the accounts were evaluated solely on their own, the case would not be totally proven by any means. However, in conjunction with all of the evidence which remains, and all that has been presented prior to this, the incidents are more believable.

Apollo 12 nearly experienced a complete electrical shutdown shortly after take-off. The ship appeared to be hit by bolts of lighting 36 1/2 and 52 seconds after launch; but since there was no thunderstorm in teh area, the event had to be explained from another standpoint. Some people speculated that the rocket created an electrical conductor to ground from the ionized exhaust and that lighting discharged through the ship. However, one source claims that observatories in Europe reported two unknown objects in the craft's vicinity as it headed toward the Moon. (22) One object appeared to be following Apollo 12 and the other was ahead of it. Both were blinking on and off rapidly. The following day the astronauts reported two UFOs or bogeys about 132,000 miles out, and during their conversations with Mission Control, one of the objects flew off at high speed. (23) As allegedly received by Ground Control which did not come from the space capsule but from elsewhere. The noise was also supposedly heard by the atronauts and was described as static, whistles, and a constant beeping sound. (24)

The subject of fireflies has been mentioned several times. When the Apollo 16 astronauts were coasting towards the Moon, they entered a region of space swarming with these particles. However, NASA insists that they were flakes of paint which was applied to keep the craft from overheating in the Sun. But again, accompanying this occurrence, Mattingly reported that problems had arisen with the guidance and navigation systems. There was no attitude indication and the gimbal platform had locked. A manual realighment became necessary and the "snowflakes" traveling with the ship interfered with the star sightings. Typically, no one determined what happened; they merely suggested that another "electronic glitch" had occurrec. Somehow, electrical transients were created in the electrical circuitry which created temporary malfunctions which later disappeared. Before the Apollo 16 descent, another bad circuit in the steering system controlling the main rocket engine occurred. This caused the engine bell to oscillate sideways. (25)

It appears that electronic glitches, UFO sightings, and luminous particles may be related phenomena. An examination of this relationship provides a great deal of information about what may have really happened to the astronauts. John Glenn saw luminous particles for about four minutes during every orbit when coming into the Sun. He clearly stated that they came toward the capsule from a distance. Glenn may have been observing the disintegration of certain particles which are emited continuously by the Sun. Accumulated evidence indicates that they fill the space between planets and galazies, and that their constituent particles probably consist of photons of light. When these particles disintegrate, photons are released. The nature of these particles may be intimately connected with the energies used to propel the UFOs which were allegedly seen by some of the astronauts. When UFOs came in close proximity to the NASA spacecraft, the concentration of these "firefly" particles may have increased tremendously. The particles seem to carry and electrical charge and penetrate readily through the material of a spacecraft. If they disintegrate when interacting with matter and other particles in space, the astronauts would see them inside and outside their ships. The effect of these particles on the spacecraft would be to cause overloading of electrical systems and electronic noise in the radio communication circuits. Since they may be emitted in high concentrations by UFOs, objects in the vicinity would be bathed in them sufficiently to cause the overloads and short-circuiting. For example, Apollo 10's guidance system could have been short-circuited by these particles from an approaching UFO.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 4 -

The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor

(A Case Study In Police State Tactics In America)

On Monday, April 18, 1993 the U.S. government, in an act of mass murder unrivaled in U.S. history (intended to send a warning to gun owners and so-called "religious nuts" across the country), burned 86 people, including 24 children to death in the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas - climaxing a 51 day seige launched by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, (BATF) on February 28, 1993. As editorialist Charley Reese recently wrote: "When you start with an "allegation" that a gun control law has been violated, and you end up with nearly 100 people, including 25 children, killed, and millions of taxpayers dollars down the drain, that's bad law enforcement no matter how you slice it."

Koresh and his followers held no hostages, had committed no violent crimes, were not threatening to kill or harm anyone. They were minding their own business on their own property. Everyone in the compound was there of their own free will. Texas social workers had been in the compound and found no indication that any outsider who visited the compound would be in any danger. One of the children living in the compound told her father, according to him, that "it was a joy to live there."

A massive coverup by the Clintonistas, the FBI, the BATF, and the Establishment-controlled media has pacified the great majority of the American public in spite of the worst massacre of men, women and children by our government in U.S. history. President Clinton and the Establishment's message in the aftermath was clear: Let this be a warning to religious misfits, dissidents, gun regulations violators, Constitutionalists., and traditionalists: Get in our way, oppose us, or thumb your nose at us and we will destroy you - by fire if necessary.

What a horror to watch men, women and children burned to death for no other crime than resisting the omnipotent state. It is a chilling example of the police state that is emerging in American with ominous parallels to Nazi Germany, which "coincidentally" massacred hundreds of Jews in the Warsaw ghetto exactly 50 years earlier on April 19, 1943. Gun control, people control, persecution of religious minorities, and incredible ruthlessness and wickedness were all part of the Third Reich in Germany and are part of the Fourth Reich emerging in America today.

The Branch Davidians were not the first (nor will they be the last) group the BATF has attacked for "alleged" gun control violations. Last year alone, the BATF raided over 2,000 homes or businesses with a number of innocent victims killed, and tens of millions in assets seized and hundreds of Americans jailed, in their quest for the Holy Grail called gun control.

And it should be realized that this gestapo-like organization did not just arrive with Bill Clinton. It came on stream in 1968 with the Gun Control Act of 1968 and has been growing in power and in its attacks on the American people ever since.

As syndicated columnist Paul Craig Roberts noted: "the tragedy near Waco happened precisely because of federal laws regulating gun ownership. T he Branch Davidians hadn't assaulted anyone. They lived peacefully in the community. Except for federal gun laws they would all still be alive. It is the liberal premise that gun ownership is evil, should be illegal or at least heavily regulated, and that has created an atmoshpere in which the BATF like an unthinking bully, can run roughshod over Americans' constitutional rights, due process, and freedom." [ED NOTE: And as the gun control legislation described above passes, BATF attacks on honest law-abiding gun owners are likely to grow 10-fold!]

It is obvious that the government (and the BATF) wanted a highly publicized "victory" over gun owners and "religious nuts," and thanks to the whitewashing and coverup by the Administration and the media, the American people have by-and-large slept through the most unspeakable slaughter of innocents in U.S. history. In spite of all the mess-ups, the government has its victory, gun owners and religious groups across America now live in fear of similar treatment at the hands of Clinton's Gestapo, and the momentum toward gun control, toward persecution of Christians and other minority religious groups, traditionalists, and Constitutionalists, and towards a socialist America and the New World Order continues to accelerate.

If the inhabitants of Mt. Carmel had been dangerous terrorists, drug dealers, or enemies on the battlefield, the government attack could not have been more brutal.

After the initial attack (02/28/93) Former McClennon County Texas District Attorney Vic Feazell blamed the BATF for the deadly confrontation, accusing them of "a vulgar display of power".

In 1987, Feazell helped lead an investigation of the Davidians and their firearms, in which they wer completely exonerated from any illegal activity. "We treated them like human beings rather than stormtrooping the place."

Likewise, Jack Harwell, the McClennon County SHeriff, called Koresh on the telephone and informed him of the charges, and asked him to turn himself in, along with six others and surrender their weapons. When deputies arrived at the Church grounds, Koresh and the other Davidian members peacefully complied. Feazell said of the Davidians, "They're protective of what's theirs. They're protective of their land. They view their land as Muslims to Mecca and Jews view Jerusalem...if they'd (the BATF) called and talked to them, the Davidians would've given them what they wanted."

Feazell's view of the BATF blundering has been seconded by anti-terrorists expert Col. Charlie Beckwith, the founder of the U.S. Army's Dellta Force Commando unit. He has told reporters the BATF raid was an "embarrassment" Beckwith faulted the plan implemented by the VATF, saying the intelligence behind it was responsible for the disaster.

Subsequent to the first BATF attack Feazell predicted that the government would kill all the Davidians, and after the massacre (the second attack) he said that they intended to kill these people from the beginning to cover the tracks of their own crimes they committed by raiding the compound to begin with.

After the original public relations disaster on 2/28, the government strategy seems to have evolved over the next 51 days as follows:

First, through a massive media discrediting of the Davidians through the "party line" press over several weeks.

Second, by slowly preparing the public to believe that all of the people remaining in the compound were under the total control of an unpredictable psychopath, and to expect a mass suicide, yet saying that there was no reason for them to believe that Koresh would carry out a mass suicide.

Third, to cloak their act in righteousness (as tyranny always does) by saying their efforst on Monday were to force the people out by using non-lethal CS gas "for the sake of the children."

USING CS GAS ON CHILDREN-President Clinton, Janet Reno, and their FBI/BATF employees have described CS gas as "a harmless tear has, an irritant, designed to cause the mothers to grab their children and run out of the building." No one in the police or military who has ever used CS gas believes this. CS gas (O-chlorobenzylidene malonitrate) has been banned as a chemical warfare battlefield agent by the Chemical Weapons COnvention signed in Paris in January by the U.S. and over 130 other nations. Used during the Nietnam War to flush Vietcong from hidden tunnels, the gas causes dizziness, disorientation, shortness of breath, chest tightness, nausea, burning of the sking, intense tearing, temporary blindness, coughing, and vomiting-in short it is designed to blind and disable (very different from "relatively harmless"). CS gas is a battlefield incapacitating gas.

On March 10, The Houston Chronicle reported that former Houston police SWAT commander Lt. Jim Gunn said that "CS gas can get into a child's lungs and cause congestion and kill them." Benjamin C. Garrett, executive director of teh Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute in Alexandria, VA said in the Washington Times (4/23/93) that: "the CS would have most harshly affected the children in the compound. The reaction would have intensified for the children since the smaller you are, the sooner you would feel response." It is important to note that the children did not have gas masks (they were too small to wear them).

Beth Stephens, a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights, a public interest law firm based in New York, said "tests have documented at least 80 deaths caused by exposure to CS gas. Tests have found that CS is a toxic substance which is highly dangerous to people who inhale its fumes, particularly when in confined areas." CS was pumped into the Mt. Carmel compound (an enclosed area) for six hours before the facility caught fire and burned to the ground.

The Washington Times (4/22/93) wrote: "'The powerful chemical teh FBI used at the Branch Davidian compound would have turned the cult children's last moments into a final hell,' chemical experts said yesterday. 'It would have panicked the children whose eyes would have involuntarily shut. Their throats and lungs would have been blurning. They would have been coughing wildly,' said Benjamin Garrett. ' Eventually they would have been vomiting in a final hell'" [ED NOTE: THis is the gas CLinton, Reno, and their underlings described as a "harmless irritant."]

This writer has talked to a half dozen special forces, military, and police personnel who all agree that CS is a highly toxic battlefield immobilization gas. "Bo" Gritz told this writer that: "CS gas is not just an irritant; it is designed to knock you down and makes you incapable of any practicle functions." That our government would use it on women and children (thereby immobilizing them and preventing them from running from the building) is creul, inhuman, and unspeakable evil and is the kind of thing the Nazis and Communists would have relished in..

THE GOVERNMENT COVERUP: OPERATION DAMAGE CONTROL (OR WHITE WASH) The U.S. government has refined the art of political coverup to a science. They have had practice: 1) The POW/MIA Coverup after World War II, Korea, and Vietnam whereby thousands of American POWs and servicement were left in the hands of the communists; 2) The Kennedy Assassinations (John and Bobby) Coverup which is now in its 31st year; 3) The Watergate Coverup which ultimately backfired on Nixon and Company; 4) The AIDS Coverup presently being perpetrated by the government (and particularly the CDC) to hide the extent and magnitude of the AIDS crisis; and, now, 5) The Waco Massacre Coverup.

a) BURNING AND BULLDOZING THE EVIDENCE: The BATF (and other government agencies) love to burn, bulldoze or cremate the evidence. In the Weaver case, the government tried to burn out the Weaver cabin by dumping fuel on the cabin via helicopter and only an alert reporter waving a camera in the air saved the surviving Weavers from the same fate as the Branch Davidians. Shortly after Randy Weaver, Kevin Harris and the three Weaver girls came out of the cabin, the BATF and FBI grabbed the bodies of Vicki and Sam Weaver and had them cremated. Therefore, no trial evidence from autopsies. (Sam Weaver, age 14, was shot several times in the back by the marshals, Vicki in the head by an FBI sniper).

In Waco, on April 19, crucial physical evidence and key witnesses were consumed by fire. Then on May 12, FBI officials, citing the fear that someone might fall in the bunker (though the entire site was fenced and guarded), and a need to fill holes and cover trash and raw sewage for safety and health reasons, rolled bulldozers across the burned out compound completely obliterating any remaining evidence.

b) SILENCING BATF AND FBI AGENTS - Shortly after the original BATF attack, two agents came forward on TV in New York (though their faces were not shown) and said they were afraid of a coverup. All BATF agents have already been threatened by the Washington office of BATF with the possiblity of being punished, dismissed, or prosecuted for speaking publicaly about the raid. The agency is struggling to keep these agents silent. Four of their comrades died because of bungling, malfeasance, and mendacity at the top of the BATF.

c) THE SO CALLED "INDEPENDENT" ARSON TEAM HAD CLOSE TIES WITH THE BATF The Clintonistas, immediately after the fire, suggested an "independent" investigation to investigate the burned out Branch Davidian compound site and confirm the "truth." That "independent" investigator, who claimed the fire had been set by the Davidians (based, he said, on infrared photos taken from a helicopter) was employee (who had been on a joint BATF task force for 10 years) and long time contractor for the FBI, whose wife is personal secretary to the head of the Houston BATF - where the whole raid was planned. The FBI controlled the crime scene for three weeks following the holocaust, letting no Texas Rangers, local police or truly independent arson investigators in, and then bulldozed the entire site on May 12. (So, now, no one else can investigate the burnt out compound.)

d) THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WILL NOT INVESTIGATE THE DECISIONS FOR THE FINAL ASSAULT - Although Bill Clinton promised a "vigorous and through" investigation of the handling of the entire Waco affair, on May 15 the Justice Department said it would not investigate the decision making process associated with the final assault. (This is like saying in a murder case we will not investigate who pulled the trigger or who gave the order to pull the ttrigger, or in Watergate, not investigating who gave the order for the Watergate breakin). As the New York Times (5/16/93) said: "Clinton officials said that since Ms. Reno has been widely supported in Congress, and since polls show that the majority of Americans supported her decision to use tear gas, and blame the cult members themselves for the final deadly fire, department officials concluded that nothing could be gained by looking more closely at her order to carry out the assault."

e) LIES THE GOVERNMENT TOLD DURING AND AFTER OPERATION WACO - "Governments are constituted to lie to the greatest number of people the greater part of the time." Machiavelli, in The Prince. BATF, FBI, and Clinton Administration officials have consistently lied and contradicted themselves since the siege of Mt. Carmel began. Just a few of a growing list of the lies include:

1. The media was told the day before the raid (2/27) to get ready for a big blowout and to get their TV cameras in place. The BATF originally denied it told the media, but later admitted that it had..

2. The BATF said that Koresh had to be arrested at the compound because he had not left it for several months. Numerous people in the area said that was a lie and that they had frequently seen him out jogging, at the store, and in town until shortly before the attack. The BATF finally admitted they knew nothing about Koresh's movement because they NEVER even put him under surveillance, let alone did they try to arrest him.

3. The BATF originally said that they had an arrest warrant for Koresh and a search warrant for the compound. Later it was shown that they only had a search warrant and no arrest warrant.

4. The BATF said that the element of surprise was the key to success and that they wouldn't have attacked if they had known that the Branch Davidians were expecting them. This was a lie. Everyone in town, including the Branch Davidians, knew about hte coming attack. They moved a whole army of men and equipment up to the compound. Later BATF director Higgins admitted that they knew they had lost the element of surprise and went ahead with the attack anyway. That decision caused the death of four BATF agents.

5. The BATF told the Texas National Guard (in order to obtain use of their helicopters), that there was an illegal drug lab at the compound. There was no evidence of this before, during, or after the raid according to the WACO Tribune-Herald (03/28/93).

6. On March 6, FBI officers denied that they had any plans to use psychological warfare techniques against the Branch Davidians (i.e., such as loud rock music, bright lights, weird sounds[animals being slaughtered]). The FBI used them constantly throughout the seige.

7. In his press conference the evening of the fire, Bill Clinton said Janet Reno had acted "because of the children" who were "being abused." Later, officials admitted that there was no evidence of child abuse.

8. On March 2, the FBI's Bob Ricks told reporters that when the FBI approached Koresh, he was going to go outside with grenades (in front of the TV cameras), pull the pin, commit suicide and take as many agents with him as he could. On 4/20 on MacNeil/Lehrer Newshour FBI Director William Sessions said that all fo the FBI analysis of Koresh indicated that he would NEVER commit suicide.

9. On April 28, FBI Deputy Director Floyd Clarke told the House Judiciary Committee that the "Branch Davidians had used their own children as human shields by holding them up in front of the windows." The truth is, the Branch Davidians hoisted their children up to the windows to see the M1-A1 Abrams battle tanks sitting in their front yard, as FBI spokesman Richard Swensen later admitted.

10. BATF Director Stephen Higgins testified before a Senate subcommittee (04/02/93) that the BATF mission failed only "because the Branch Davidians ambushed the BATF." This is a lie. The BATF attacked the Branch Davidians and not the other way arround. (Video Footage Clearly Shows this).

11. The FBI and Janet Reno stated repeatedly that the reason they attacked the compound on April 19 was "concern for the safety and well being of the children" This was a lie! You don't ram into buildings with military tanks and pump CS gas ( a gas so deadly and debilitating that it has been banned by international treaty for use in warfare) into a building filled with women and children."

12. CS gas was described by Clinton, Reno and FBI officials as a harmless (irritant) tear gas. This is a lie. It is 80 times stronger than tear gas, immobilizes its victims and throws them into violent coughing and convulsions (i.e. the "perfect" weapon for a police state to use against young women & children).

13. Clinton said on 04/20/93 that CS was a "tear gas which had been tested not to cause permanent damage to adults or children." That is a lie. (See Above)

14. The government said they had exhausted all avenues to resolve the standoff. This is a lie. They refused to let any of the family members speak with the Branch Davidians even though this has helped to resolve many such former standoffs. They refused to let "Bo" Gritz and Jack McLamb, who negotiated Randy Weaver and his family out last August, assist, although they volunteered numerous times.

15. The BATF said after the February 28 fiasco that "we were outgunned.." Another lie. They had helicopter gunships, armored vehicles, and fully automatic weapons to use against the Branch Davidians, not to mention stun grenades and the military's most high tech equipment.

16. George Stephanopoulos said: "The children were being abused, even to instruction on how to clamp down on cyanide pills." Though this makes for chilling headlines, the FBI has denied that this was true.

17. On April 19, FBI spokesman Bob Rocks quoted Branch Davidian survivor Renos Avraam as saying: "The fire's been lit. The fire's been lit." But when questioned on camera by reporters, Avraam said: "One of the tanks knocked over a gas lantern, and it started a fire under some bales of hay that were laying around. The fire wasn't started by us."

PRESIDENT CLINTON'S PRESS CONFERENCE AND DAMAGE CONTROL - President Clinton gave a Rose Garden press conference on 04/20/93 in which he defended and sought to justify Reno's, The FBI's and BATF's actions in Waco. The lies and distortions which Clinton told in that press conference were incredible:

1. "The Branch Davidians had illegally stockpiled weapons and ammunition." [ED. NOTE: That was only suspected, but never proven. Shouldn't the government have proven that before they killed almost 100 people? Is it now lawful to kill people during investigations of wrongdoing? Lawful or not, it is now commonplace in America!]

2. Koresh "placed innocent children at risk." [ED NOTE: There was no risk until the government attacked the compound. Wasn't it Reno, the BATF, and FBI that put the innocent children at risk?]

3. "The Bureau's efforts were ultimately unavailing because the individual with whom they were dealing David Koresh, was dangerous, irrational, and probably insane." [ED NOTE: None of the townspeople who knew Koresh observed this, nor did the former Distric Attorney of McClennon County, nor the sheriff's deputies who knew him. He did have strange religious views, but most of the townspeople who knew him liked him.]

4. Clinton said the April 19 FBI attack on the Branch Davidians was "an effort to protect the young hostages. " [ED NOTE: The government didn't protect them, they killed them. And, the children were not hostages. They were hthere of their own free will. The Waco seige was never a hostage crisis.]

5. Clinton said: "The [FBI] plan included a decision to withhold the use of ammunition, even in the face of fire, and instead use tear gas that would not cause permanent damage." [ED. NOTE: No one knows who fired at who during the final seige, because the press were kept two miles away, unless one wants to accept Clinton's word, and the government did not use tear gas - it was highly lethal, flammable CS gas (as discussed above).]

6. Clinton said: "Mr. Koresh's response to the demand for his surrenter by federal agents was to destroy himself and murder the children who were his captives...He killed those he controlled." [ED NOTE: There is no evidence that Koresh murdered any children; it is open to question whether at the last moment he shot himself; and the chidlren (according to local townspeople, Branch Davidian survivors, and Texas social workers, were NOT captives.]

7. Clinton said: "I hope very much that others who will be tempted to join cults and to become involved with people like David Koresh will be deterred by the horrible scenes they have seen over the last seven weeks." [ED NOTE: Is this a not so veiled threat that if you belong to an unpopular, misfit, non-mainstream religious group, the same thing could happen to you? The intimidation value from the Waco inferno for the government against small religious grounps, conservative, patriotic, pro-life, or non-mainstream groups is incredible. Conform or we'll destroy you!]

8. When asked by a reporter, "Why now," Clinton replied: "There was a limit to how long the federal authorities could maintain with their limited resources the quality and intensity of coverage by experts there. They might be needed in other parts of the country." [ED NOTE: Limited resources? This is the government which is giving billions of dollars to Russia in aid and requesting billions more for 1001 boondoggles. And as far as spreading the "experts" too thin, there were only a few hundred troops and agents there. The government has tens of thousands of federal agents and allegedly over a million military personnel.]

9. Clinton said: "The danger of them [the Branch Davidians] doing something to themselves or to others was likely to increase, not decrease, with the passage of time." [ED NOTE: Quite to the contrary, as time went by, the likelyhood that they wwould come out increased, according to experts who have dealt with many of these types of crises.]

10. Clinton said: "They [the FBI] had reason to believe that the children inside the compound were being abused significantly, as well as being forced to live in unsanitary and unsafe conditions." [ED NOTE: There was no evidence of child abuse according to several Texas social workers who had visited the compound. However, the gassing (with CS gas) and burning of the children by the Clintonistas does seem to this writer to qualify as child abuse. And if the conditions were unsanitary and unsafe in the compound it was because the government had turned off the water, head and electricity 50 days earlier. Government gunfire into the building might also qualify as "an unsafe condition."]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 5 -

FLYING SAUCERS: THE REAL STORY

Popular Science Feb '95

From the hopeless tangle of claims and counterclaims emerges the documented fact that secret military research HAS explored flying saucer flight.

Exposed and utterly alone beneath the incandescent starts of the Nevada desert, I dropped my pack and squirmed the last few yards to the summet of White Sides Mountain. Carrying only a pair of binoculars, a tape recorder and a radio scanner, I groped over the rocks, knowing that carelessness now would waste all my care in getting here: the long, 4-wheel-drive detour to avoid road sensors that alert base security, the zigzag hike through the sage brush, the pains taken to stay off ridgelines where I might be profiled against the sky.

Pulling myself up to peer over the last jagged parapet, I was sure for the first time in hours that I was in the right place. Across 12 miles of darkened scrub, just beneath the far horizon glimmered Dreamland, a splash of gemlike lights tossed into a hollow in the hills. Also known as Area 51, it's a terrestrial black hole into which it's estimated millions of tax dollars disappear each day while hardly a word of explanation escapes.

A complex of hangars, giant parabolic antennas and one of the longest runways on Earth, Area 51 spreads the length of Nevada's remote Groom Lake dry lake bed. For four decades-through the top-secret U-2 spyplane program of the '50s, the SR-71 spyplane of the '60s, the F-117A stealth fighter of the '80s-Groom Lake has been where our government has come when it wants to be alone.

Now, five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the lights of Groom Lake still burn throughout the night with wartime urgency. And whatever secrets lie there are guarded with undiminished vigilance. Armed, unidentified men stalk the sagebrush in camouflage fatigues. Unmarked Black Hawk helicopters sweep the hills. Electronic sensors hidden along the approaching roads report the presence of vehicular traffic. Keep in mind that you're subject to all of this on public land, before you make it to the border marked with signs reading "use of deadly force authorized."

UFO capital

It was not until this past summer; amid mounting publicity, that the Air Force gave up denying the undeniable. "We do have facilities within the complex near the dry lake bed of Groom Lake," says its latest official statement. The Air Force adds that the Nellis Range Complex-of which Groom Lake is a part-is "used for testing and training technologies, operations and systems critical to the effectiveness of U.S. military forces. Specific activities conducted at Nellis cannot be discussed any further than that."

But that, of course, is only the beginning of the discussion. With so much unexplained, speculation naturally ranges from the merely exotic to the otherworldly. Glenn Campbell, a former computer programmer who has studied and written about the base fulltime since moving to the tiny nearby town of Rachel a year and a half ago, fondly refers to his adopted neighborhood as "the UFO capital," and "America's most popular secret airbase."

Articles and TV specials have theorized endlessly about Groom Lake. Aerospace technology enthusiasts point to the likelihood that Lockheed would be testing a hypersonic spyplane there, just as it earlier tested the SR-71. But what has really established Groom Lake as a place of pilgrimage for UFO watchers is the lure of the flying saucer.

It was this same fascination-one that has gripped America since the term first came into common parlance 47 years ago-that brought me to Groom Lake this past fall. It stands to reason that if our military has flying saucers, this is where they'd be.

But as it turned out, Groom Lake was only the beginning of the story. Sure, it is possible that there are flying saucers somewhere in the Nellis Range Complex. Given the level of secrecy almost anything is possible, and there are in face a number of intriguing claims to this effect. But more fascinating is the verifiable fact that these would not be the first flying saucers our government has hidden from us.

First Sighting

Think back to 1947, to a world sick of war and an America racing to build its nuclear deterrent against the looming Soviet threat. In June of that year, while flying his private plane near Washington's Mount Rainier, Kenneth Arnold said he spotted "a chain of nine peculiar-looking aircraft" that "flew like a saucer would if you skipped it across the water." By timing their passage between tow peaks, he later estimated their ground speed to be about 1700 mph.

Arnold, a deputy federal marshal and successful businessman, was a difficult witness to dismiss. His sighting was widely reported and thoroughly investigated, eventually by the Army Air Force (AAF), which feared he might have seen some new Soviet secret weapon.

But first another possibility had to be ruled out: Was it one of ours? Accordingly to Curtis Peebles' Watch The Skies!, a history of the flying saucer phenomenon recently published by the Smithsonian, an early suspect was a formerly secret Navy fighter program. "Are you positive the Navy junked the XF5U-1 project?" asked one 1947 AAF memo.

America's first saucer

Built by Chance Vought of Stratford, Connecticut, the XF5U-1 "Flying Flapjack" was the closest thing anybody knew of to a flying saucer. Although capable of nothing like the 1700 mph reported by Arnold, its bizarre circular plan-form nonetheless promised performance unlike anything that had come before.

The program traces back to the 1930s, when National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics engineer Charles Zimmerman flew a series of unmanned models that led him to the Flapjack shape. The extraordinary virtue of the design was that it defied what had seemed a fundamental aerodynamic tradeoff. The Flapjack managed both the high top speeds desirable for combat and the low stalling speeds needed to operate out of small airfields, or off the decks of ships. In face, with enough engine power, it could hang by its props, and take off vertically, without any airstrip at all.

The saucer shape's high-speed performance came from the fact that it was essentially a very low aspect ratio wing - a wing with a low ratio of length to width-like that on a modern fighter jet. Although stubby wings can be shaped to produce relatively little drag at high speeds, they suffer badly at low speeds. The cause is partly that large amounts of air spill up from under the wingtips and swirl into tornado-like vortices that trail behind the aircraft. Zimmerman limited this induced drag by placing the Flashback's propellers at its edges and gearing them so that they counteracted the vortices.

This simple idea proved out remarkably well in more than 100 flights by a manned test craft called the V-173. In late 1942, the NAVY okayed construction of two full-scale prototypes. Powered by a pair of 1600-horsepower Pratt & Whitney Twin Wasp radials, the XF5U-1 was expected to fly at up to 425 miles per hour and yet alight daintily at as little as 40 mph. Based on his experience with the V-173, Zimmerman predicted that a turbine-powered Flapjack would eventually reach 550 mph, while takeoff and landing speeds would dwindle to zero.

We'll never know if he was right. The XF5U-1 prototypes were ready by 1947, but never flew. The Navy by this time decided to throw its full weight behind more orthodox jet fighters and ordered the XF5U-1 destroyed. No plane did what the Flapjack promised to do until the Hawker Siddeley Kestrel-a precursor to today's Harrier vertical-takeoff attack fighter-began flying in the 1960s.

As 1947 drew to a close, the Arnold sighting and a number of others remained unresolved. The XF5U-1 wasn't behind them. Nor did they seem to be anything within the reach of Soviet technology. An exhaustive review of Nazi wartime research hadn't turned up any explanations either. The newly instituted U.S. Air Force took very seriously the possibility that something we didn't understand was roaming our airspace. It secretly launched Project Sign, the first of a series of UFO investigations that were to stretch on for more than 20 years.

Shape of the future

As the Air Force pondered reports of unbelievable high-performance flying discs, engineers grew more and more intrigued by the aerodynamic and structural properties of such a shape. A lengthy and detailed patent applied for by the Lockheed Aircraft Corp. in 1953 describes an "aircraft of circular plan-form a nd of bi-convex vertical cross section" - basically, a giant lentil. As with the Flying Flapjack, the benefits foreseen included a combination of high forward speeds (better than Mach 4 in this case) and vertical takeoff and landing capability.

The patent enumerates several properties that suit a saucer to those goals. The shape, it claims, provides excellent structural rigidity, aerodynamic stability in vertical ascent and descent, and room inside for large amounts of payload and fuel. Furthermore, its smooth profile and unbroken leading and trailing edges were though to lend it inherent aerodynamic efficiency.

There's no record of Lockheed's radical craft ever getting off the drawing board, but it seems somehow fitting that there should be an early link between Lockheed and a saucer. As creator of the U2, SR-71 and F-117A, Lockheed's name intertwines with Groom Lake's from the beginning. And saucers, of course, are what people come here to see.

Weapon System 606A

Around the time Lockheed applied for its patent, Britain's Avro Aircraft, builder of some of World War II's most successful bombers, began work on a more practical saucer at its plant near Toronto, Canada. Under a Canadian government contract, Avro sketched out a vehicle that harnesses a newly discovered benefit of the circular wing. Jetted down from the wing's perimeter, a circular curtain of thrust created a "bubble" of high pressure air that resulted in very efficient vertical lift, much like a hovercraft but without the flexible skirt.

Avro designed this effect into a GETOL (Ground Effect Takeoff and Landing) craft that used it to get airborne, then gradually directed thrust aft until lift on the circular wing took over. Canada soon decided it couldn't afford to pursue the idea, but the U.S. Air Force saw it as a way out of a troubling Cold War vulnerability.

Fearing that Soviet strikes on European airfields could all too easily take out planes out of a fight, the Air Force picked up funding for Avro's GETOL work in 1954. Under a highly classified program designated Weapon System 606A, it developed a concept plane with a top speed of 1000 mph.

Considering it would be years before a fighter without GETOL capabilities went that fast, this was a radical proposition. To lower the stakes, the Air Force joined the Army in funding construction of a slower, simpler test craft. The result was one of the strangest machines in the annals of military aviation.

The VZ-9V Avrocar bristled with untried ideas. Buried at the center of its 18-ft-dia. circular wing was a 5-ft. fan, surrounded by three turbojets lying on their sides in a triangle. Jet exhaust spun the fan by blowing over turbine blades that ringed its edge, and the resulting thrust was ducted out to nozzles at the wing's periphery.

Lacking conventional tail surfaces, the Avrocar was expected from the outset to be unstable. The designers devised an ingenious but complex mechanism to automatically feed corrections back into the control system, using the central fan as a gyroscopic reference. In essence, it strove to mimic the performance of a modern computerized fly-by-wire system by purely mechanical means.

But instability still proved to be the Avrocar's undoing. In test flights, it hovered reasonably well close to the ground, but at 5 or 6ft. it developed a violent "hubcapping" wobble and had to be tethered for its own protection. Wind tunnel tests showed the control system couldn't hold it steady in forward flight either, and speeds greater than 35 mph were never attempted. In December of 1961, with $10 million spent, the project was abandoned.

"It was a very ingenious idea, but it was just way too early," says Dan Murray, who managed the program for the Air Force. Murray now believes that helicopters and other specialized craft have taken over the roles for which the Avrocar was planned. "I'm sure you could build a flying saucer today," he says. "The question is, why?"

Saucers today

Yet the saucer lives on. Sikorsky Aircraft has been testing a 6-ft.-dia. discshaped unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) called the Cypher since 1988. In many respects, it is the robotic heir to the Avrocar, with maneuverability that lets it lurk around terrain features as its carriers out reconnaissance. Then there's a series of saucers build by Moller International, whose founder, Paul Moller, drew lessons from the Avrocar. His latest, the one man, 8 engine M200X, flew stably and demonstrated technologies for a proposed flying car. In the lighter-that-air arena, the Russians looked to a shape strikingly reminiscent of Lockheed's 1953 patent to make their huge Thermoplane cargo blimps stable at low speeds and efficient at high speeds.

But what about high-performance saucers, saucers like those the Air Force feared 47 years ago? Was Weapon System 606A and the failed Avrocar really the end of large-scale military saucer research?

Tantalizing leads suggest not. William Blake, an engineer at the Air Force's Wright Laboratory, told us of a huge nuclear powered craft designed by Convair in the early '60s under a Navy contract for a transoceanic transport. He found a brief article dated June 1960, which shows a general arrangement drawing, and describes the vehicle as 400ft. in diameter and capable of carrying a million-pound payload. Known as the ground-effect machine, or GEM, the concept relied on a curtain jet like ht Avrocar for lift near the ground, but had no provision for flight at higher altitudes.

More recent but also more dubious is the well-publicized story of Robert Lazar, who says he worked at a Nellis Range base even more secret than Area 51. He says the base, called S4, consists of nine underground hangars containing extraterrestrial saucers that the government is trying to reproduce. But when we ran his explanation of the spacecrafts' workings by a respected physicist, we were told it contained obvious errors. Nor does Lazar's claimed educational background check out.

A more mundane scenario might warrant consideration, however. Recent years have seen the maturation of the electronic flight controls needed to stabilize a saucer, while stealth has brought a whole new set of parameters to aircraft design. Although the techniques for foiling radar are complex and largely classified, a key principle is to minimize the surfaces that might intersect a radar beam at a right angle. What, one has to wonder would do this better than a flying disc?

This question ran through my mind as I trained my telescope on Area 51. The night before, Glenn Campbell and I had been spotted by security as we watched from another hill, and we immediately heard "We just went into condition watchdog...we have visitors on the hill" over the control-tower-frequency. Something was told not to land. Something they didn't want us to see even from 12 miles away.

So tonight atop White Sides, I'm determined to lay low. The tower opens at 4 am and with the words "no condition in effect" confirms I'm undetected. At 4:30 am, a Black Hawk flying with no lights makes a low pass, but I'm hidden in a rocky ravine. Dawn breaks. Activity at the base picks up. In the crisp morning air, cars, trucks, even people are visible moving among the hangars.

An F117-A takes to the runway, but no saucers. Still, there's a strange exhilaration at my solitary view into this secret world. There's something out there. And as long as they won't tell us what it is, our dreams of flying saucers will have this place to roost.

*END*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 6 -

MEDICAL DOCTOR PUTS HIS LIFE ON THE LINE TO PROVE THE HIV VIRUS DOES NOT CAUSE AIDS.

If you or someone you know has tested positive for the HIV virus there is now good news.

The chances you will get ill or die from AIDS are no greater that if the test came out negative.

The London Times reports a major research group has recently proven the test for the HIV virus (which is claimed to cause AIDS) is completely invalid and "riddled with false positives".

Malnutrition, multiple infections, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, having once had the "flu" or measles even the bodies own natural response to anal semen all result in positive HIV/AIDS tests.

Now the truth is finally revealed. When a completely normal and health person tests positive for HIV, is then put on the deadly drug AZT - they die. Death results from the destruction of the immune system caused by the deadly drug AZT and not by HIV.

I interviewed Dr. Robert E. Willner, a medical doctor who has practiced and lectured on medicine worldwide for over 35 years. He recently stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. Dr. Willner is the author of the just published blockbuster book "Deadly Deception: The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS."

Q. Dr. Willner, you say in your book AIDS is the greatest fraud in medical history. That the perpetrators of this crime are raking in billions while innocent people are being murdered with the deadly drug AZT. Is AIDS a scam?

A. No, people are indeed dying of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or AIDS. The scam is that AIDS is not caused by HIV and AIDS is not transmitted sexually or by any other means. The real causes of AIDS have been known for centuries and have been listed in medical textbooks for over 60 years. We have all been lied to and sold a bill of goods by a handful of unscrupulous, immoral scientists that care more for money and power than for the truth and human life itself.

Most of the medically supervised AIDS deaths were either caused or contributed to by the deadly drug AZT. In many cases it was given to perfectly normal and health individuals who were terrorized by fear from the AIDS media blitz into taking the phony HIV test. When a percentage got positive test results they were then given lethal doses of AZT, a drug that was shelved over 20 years ago because it was found to be too toxic to give terminally ill cancer patients.

Q. We have been told all along that all AIDS patients have the HIV virus and that is what causes AIDS!

A. That is an absolute lie! The HIV/AIDS hypothesis was based on the fact that only 40% of AIDS cases were confirmed by the Center for Disease Control to have the antibodies to HIV and not the virus itself. In New York and San Francisco only 7% of the AIDS victims were HIV positive. This means that 60 to 93% of all AIDS patients that were used to create the AIDS hypothesis were HIV negative.

The entire AIDS hypothesis is based upon a total lie. We were all lied to when we were lead to believe that 100% of AIDS victims were HIV positive.

Q. But how could this happen?

A. To answer that question we must examine just exactly who created this great lie.

It was none other than Dr. Robert Gallo who was investigated and found guilty of "scientific misconduct". The very same Dr. Robert Gallo who just a few years prior to AIDS discovered what he called the HTLV retrovirus. He claimed that HTLV caused human leukemia but failed to gain scientific acceptance because he could not prove it.

Gallo likewise claimed that HTLV was sexually transmitted and had a latent period of 40 years.

That theory was rejected and failed to gain Dr. Gallo acceptance into the National Academy of Sciences. His theories on AIDS are just as fallacious and one cannot help but see the similarities in the scenario.

However, this time instead of trying to prove his insane theories about AIDS to his peers, without scientific proof, he by-passed them and went public.

Then, with the help of Margaret Heckler, former head of Health and Human Services, who was under great political pressure to come up with an answer to AIDS, the infamous world press announcement of the discovery of the so-called AIDS virus came about.

This great fraud is now responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of individuals world wide. It was no accident that Gallo just happened to patent the test for HIV the day after the announcement to the world was made. It likewise is no accident that Gallo is now a multimillionaire because of AIDS and his fraudulent AIDS test.

Q. Are you saying that Dr. Gallo created AIDS?

A. In a manner of speaking, yes he did. By taking a number of diseases that were killing a select group of individuals and claiming that they all had one thing in common - the innocent retrovirus he now called HIV; which he also claimed was sexually transmitted.

The truth is that these individuals were indeed dying of a variety of diseases and they all did have one thing in common but it had nothing to do with their sexual preference or with Gallo's harmless so called "mysterious" HIV retrovirus.

They were all dying from specific causes that I go into great detail explaining in my book. The information is completely documented and based on cold, hard scientific facts-not on the phony, unproven guesswork or the fraud-laced hypothesis that is the very foundation of Gallo's ridiculous AIDS theory.

Q. How do you answer proponents of the HIV/AIDS connection when they argue that "everyone knows HIV causes AIDS"?

A. Once "everyone knew" the earth was flat and the sun revolved around it. It has been more than twelve years since the so-called "discovery" of AIDS. Yet, there is still not one single reference paper that exists in the world that proves HIV causes AIDS. In other words, no experimental proof whatsoever has been offered to establish that the harmless retrovirus, which cannot even be found in 50% of the individuals with AIDS, has anything to do with it.

Q. Isn't it true that any disease capable of destroying a human body is always found in vast numbers in the infected person?

A. Yes, of course. Yet, even the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) invented by Dr. Kary Mulli, Nobel Prize Laureate, which literally makes it impossible for viruses to hide, can't find Gallo's HIV virus in sufficient quantities to give someone the flu let alone kill them.

HIV is rarely found in T-cells (1 virus per 10,000 to 1,000,000 cells) and when it is found it is doing absolutely nothing. In cases of full blown AIDS, even in those just hours from death, the virus is extremely difficult to find; and in 50% of the cases it cannot be found at all. Whenever it is found, even in active cases of AIDS, HIV is inactive, not reproducing and it is certainly not killing T-cells as Gallo claims.

Q. Then what exactly is HIV?

A. HIV is simply a harmless piece of dead tissue, not unlike numerous other retroviruses that exist in our body at any given time. It is one thousandth the size of a regular cell is harmless and is simply incapable of doing anything that Gallo claims of it.

Q. Does Dr. Mullis share your contention about HIV and AIDS?

A. Yes he does. Dr. Mullis says: "Scientists don't believe, they have evidence...There is no such body of knowledge" (with reference to HIV as the cause of AIDS).

Dr. Peter Duesberg, Professor of Molecular Biology University of CA., Berkely and member of the National Academy of Sciences, puts it even more distinctly. He writes "HIV does not cause AIDS...The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers, Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent..>The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers."

Q. Are there other who also support your position?

A. Nearly 500 of the world's top scientists are now challenging Gallo's hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS and the list is growing daily. Every statistic, every valid scientific observation and even the test of time now proves Gallo wrong. It was only a matter of time until thinking scientists raised their heads out of the sand, saw the truth and started questioning the lies that simply did not stand up to the scrutiny of impartial scientific reasoning and experimentation.

Project AIDS International charges that "the dogmatic AIDS hypothesis based on the findings of a person convicted of science fraud, is directly or indirectly responsible for the premature deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide." PAI further goes on to say: "If action is not taken immediately against those who are directly or indirectly responsible for these crimes against humanity through the practice of profit over life, the drug induced AIDS deaths will most certainly reach proportions unparalleled by any natural catastrophe in human history."

Q. What about Dr. Gallo's contention that HIV is a slow "mysterious" and "intelligent" virus.

A. Dr. Duesberg renowned as one, if not the world's foremost retroviologist, answers that question by saying that: "Slow" or "lente" viruses do not exist! It is another hypothetical invention designed to explain what is obviously nonsense. It has no basis in fact, no precedent in science, and is contradictory to 20 years of research findings (and I might add billions of dollars in funding). Retroviruses can only be replicated by the host cell, and are dependent on the life-cycle of that cell. Therefore, the virus must duplicate within hours or days in order to survive. For over 20 years, an exhaustive investigation of retroviruses reveals that there is no such thing as a "slow virus". There is nothing biochemically or genetically different about HIV that would give it the power to act any differently than any other retrovirus. As Dr. Duesberg so aptly puts it, "there are no slow viruses, only slow virologists."

Q. Did you always know HIV was not the true cause of AIDS?

A. NO. I have to admit that in the beginning I too believed Gallo's big lie. But the more I learned about retroviruses the more the AIDS hypothesis didn't make sense.

Q. Surely there were a few independent scientists who tried to expose this fraud?

A. There were and as an example of how their dissension was squelched I'll quote Dr. Joesph Sonnabend, Founder, of the AIDS Medical Foundation. His is typical of how opposition to the AIDS hypothesis was dealt with. Dr. Sonnabend writes: "...I tried to show that HTLV-1 (HIV) was not involved in AIDS, all the journals refused to publish it." After twenty one years of intensive research, not one clinically-relevant retrovirus has ever been discovered, and by scientific standards HIV is no exception. You also have to understand that when Maragaret Heckler, head of Health and Humane Services, adopted HIV as the cause of AIDS, basically all institutions which rely on federal government funding or grands had to go along and cooperate or face extinction. HHS is the paymaster for all health departments and agencies. This includes the National Institutes of Health.

Q. What about Kimberly Bergails, and Magic Johnson?

A. Kimberly Bergalis would still be alive today is she were not given AZT. Magic Johnson is probably as healthy today as he ever was and will continue to live a long and happy life so long as he does not take AZT or any other deadly drug.

Q. Why did you inoculate yourself with the blood of an HIV positive hemophiliac?

A. Because I can no longer stand by and watch the profession I love, be deceitfully used to commit murder by following the Gallo HIV/AIDS' death banner. I have vowed that if its is necessary I will repeat the process of sticking myself with the blood of an HIV positive person on television in every city in the world until this genocide stops.

Q. Dr. Willner in "Deadly Deception" you say AZT is one of the chief causes of AIDS, can you elaborate further for our readers?

A. Yes, and again I will begin by quoting Dr. Peter Duesberg: "AZT is A Random Killer Of Infected And Non Infected Cells. AZT cannot discriminate among them. It kills T-cells; B-cells; red cells, it kills all cells. AZT is a chain terminator of DNA synthesis of all cells-no exceptions. It wipes out everything. In the long run it can only lead to death of the organism-and the cemetery. AZT is a certain killer! Who will be responsible for the death of patients (some 200,000 now being treated with AZT and countless thousands who have already died from it in the past decade) that results from AZT therapy - pharmacological homicide?"

The makers of AZT claim that "it increases the quality of life." Yet, all one needs do is read the package insert that comes along with AZT and you will learn the truth.

The side effects of AZT as listed on its own package inserts are: Cancer (lymphomas), Hepatitis, Dementia, Mania (madness, frenzy), Seizures (epileptic), Anxiety, Anemia, Leukopenia, (standard laboratory evidence of immune suppression), Impotence, Severe Nausea, Chest Pain, Insomnia, Ataxia (loss of balance), Depression, Muscle Atrophy (wasting) and this is only half of the death sentence list of side effects that AZT causes. Does this sound like AZT adds to the quality of life to you or does it sound like what it really is-AIDS!

Q. Are there other causes of AIDS?

A. Yes, there are and I explain each and every known cause of AIDS in great detail in my book, and may I add, not one of them is sexually transmitted or HIV related.

Q. What can a person suffering from Acquired Immune Deficiency do?

A. There are actually many things a person with AIDS can do if there is enough time and in most cases there is. The first and most important thing is to get off any type of immune suppressive drug whether it be recreational, prescription or over the counter immediately. Secondly, don't be conned into taking AZT or any other last minuet, last chance at life. Thirdly, stop believing the lie that you are going to die. Finally get and read a copy of my book "Deadly Deception" as soon as possible. It contains the information you need to strengthen your immune system. Follow what it tells you and you will probably be OK.

This concluded my interview with Dr. WIllner. I must admit that before I read "Deadly Deception": The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS, I too was skeptical. I believed what everyone else believed that HIV caused AIDS, that HIV is sexually transmitted, that if you have HIV you will eventually die of AIDS.

In "Deadly Deception" Dr. Willner proves the AIDS hypothesis is totally fraudulent. Its perpetrators are guilty of criminal fraud and murder.

The HIV virus does not and could not possible cause AIDS or any serious disease for that matter.

AIDS is not transmitted sexually nor is it contagious by any method!

Backed by scientific and factual proof you will learn the truth:

What the real causes of AIDS are and how to totally avoid them.

How the HIV test can be positive because of having a simple "Flu" vaccination, the measles or many other common infections!

Why AIDS is not an epidemic but a total myth based on false projections disproved by time and the statistics.

In the United States, more people die each year overdosing on sleeping pills than die from AIDS!

Why the homosexual community erroneously became identified as AIDS carriers.

Why AIDS is a syndrome transmittable disease.

Why 25 to 30 diseases were, for the first time in recorded history, lumped together under a new name (AIDS) to give the appearance of an epidemic!

Acquired Immune Deficiency is not new; its cause have been known and written about in medical books for almost seventy years.

On October 3, 1993, the London Times headline read, "African Aids 'a myth'". Inside, across two pages, the headline screamed, "The Plague That Never Was", yet this story which exposes the AIDS myth in Africa has not even been mentioned in the mainstream U.S. press...Why?

More than 500 of the world's leading scientists have challenged the AIDS hypothesis - they are being silenced, slandered and ignored...Why?

The Answers are all in "Deadly Deception", the nearly 300 page hard cover book!

"Deadly Deception" blows the lid off the entire AIDS fraud. It names those responsible. It takes every argument you have ever heard about the relationship between HIV, sex and AIDS and tears them to shreds by exposing the lies to the bright light of truth.

Dr. Willner writes in clear, easy to understand language that is both entertaining and enlightening. You won't be able to put this book down. After you read it you will never fear AIDS again, your eyes however, will forever be opened to how easy it is for us all to be duped by half truths, lies, prejudice, fear and by unscrupulous, power and money hungry people who think they can literally get away with murder in the name of science.

As a closing note; two AIDS researchers in Europe have already been found guilty of fraud.

An independent study has proven AZT to be 1000 times more toxic to human cells than was originally claimed.

There is currently a class action suite in England against the makers of AZT by the families of its victims.

I URGE each and everyone of you to get a copy of Dr. Willner's new book: "Deadly Deception":The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do NOt Cause AIDS.

You can order it now. Simply write the words "Deadly Deception" on a plain piece of paper and sent it along with your name, address and check or money order for $23.95 + $3.95 ship. & handling (total of $27.90) to :

Peltec Publishing Co. Dept. 104D 4400 N. Federal Hyw. Suite 210 Boca Raton, FL 33431

or Call 1-800-214-3645 & ask for operator 10D

Your copy of "Deadly Deception" will be shipped immediately upon receipt of order. Satisfaction is 100% guaranteed or your money back. If you know someone who has gotten an HIV positive test, why not give them a copy of this article. It may save their life!

*END*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 7 -

TOTAL Surveillance : Your Life On A Chip

From Mondo 2000 #13

By Charles Ostman

Imagine a world in which every aspect of your life, past and present, is encrypted on a personal ID card and stored on a nationwide data base. Where virtually all communications media-soon to be 100% digital-are automatically monitored by computerized phone taps and satellites from control centers thousands of miles away. Where self-training neural net and artificial intelligence data search systems scan for undesirable lifestyles and target you for automatic monitoring.

Personal privacy was once considered the most sacred of our constitutional rights; agencies were severely limited by law. All that's about to change drastically thanks to a deadly combination of extremely sophisticated surveillance technology, ubiquitous digital information collection, and centralized interagency data exchange.

Until recently the "supersecret" National Reconnaissance Organization did not exist-even though it has the largest budget of any intelligence agency. They are responsible for the design, development and procurement of all US reconnaissance satellites and their continued management once in orbit. Recently photos have surfaced in the press of its huge new complex being completed in Chantilly, Virginia. (Senator John Warner-Liz Taylor's ex-has described the one million square foot complex as a "Taj Mahal.") The NRO is eagerly implementing such technologies as ultra-high storage capacity holographic films (allowing huge amounts of personal information to be present on your ID card) and self-training artificial intelligence software that tracks your personal data without human intervention. A new era of ubiquitous surveillance is dawning.

A struggling military-industrial complex searching for new markets for their technologies has merged forces with a government obsessed with ever tighter control over the activities of the general public. Congresswoman Barbara Jordan has proposed a "National Employment Verification Card" that will be required for all employment in the U.S. The card will, of course, have a magnetic data strip, and altering or counterfeiting the card will be a federal felony offense.

There is a dedicated and aggressive effort underway to chart various genetic features as part of one's personal information set. The fed's goal is to have the ability to screen individuals for everything from behavioral characteristics to sexual orientation, based on genetic information embedded in your personal (and required) National ID card.

Biometric signature technologies have been developing apace. There is even a technique available to translate human DNA into bar codes for efficient digital transmission between agencies.

Are these science fiction story lines or the ravings of a paranoid lunatic? I wish they were. As a former research engineer at Lawrence Livermore Labs and other government labs, I watched some of these mad schemes being hatched. This technology is on the street today or about to leave the labs and believe me, it goes way beyond Orwell's worst nightmares. Listen up and hunker down.

A fundamental shift in the legal definition of personal privacy is occurring right now. A court-issued warant used to be a universal requirement for personal surveillance, such as phone tapping, observing physical papers, and probing financial or medical records. Now, in this new age of AI-driven monitoring and data tracking systems, there are no pesky people in the loop.

A computer doesn't need to seek a court warrant to monitor every aspect of your private life. A self-training automated surveillance system doesn't need permission to observe your movements or communications.

Total data tracking is already commonplace for financial institutions and private security operations. Tomorrow, it will be commonplace for all of us. The technical elements of a massive surveillance engine are in place. It's just a matter of turning the key to fire it up. Let's examine these elements and why you should be concerned.

Universal Encryption Chip

It sounds logical. The feds want to preserve privacy, so their story goes, so they've announced that an encryption chip will go into all phones and computers that they buy. But what do they really want in the long run?

How about a government-issue encryption chip in all personal computers and communication devices? That way, the feds can deal with drug smugglers, terrorists, kiddie porn merchants, and other miscreants who use encoded messages.

Of course, they'd have to prevent tampering with the chip. In fact, the technology to do just that has already been developed at Sandia National Laboratory. Scientists there have developed an optical sensor that uses a powdered silicon optical absorption layer in an optical waveguide embedded in a chip. A micro photodetector detects even the slightest intrusion into the chip package by measuring a slight change in the photonic conduction through the waveguide. It can then send an alert via modem to a central monitoring system to notify an interested party that the device has been tampered with. Sandia is also developing a microchemical intrusion detector that would be sensitive to the chemical signature of human fingertips.

Is this all part of some master plan, or what?

In fact, in the near future, all encryption hardware and software will be subject to federal registration/authorization. Possession of unauthorized encryption/decryption capability will be punishable as a federal felony. In other words, if it doesn't have a handy back door for NSA snoops, it ain't legal.

We can further speculate that the feds will embed chips in all equipment sold for use in data transmission, digital phone calls and all other frequencies. Note: all new phone systems wired and wireless will be digital in the next three years.

Intelligent Video

Nor would you know what's watching you. Security cameras are becoming standard in corporate and government facilities. They may soon even be required. Why? Ostensibly because they want to recover loses in case of theft, keep insurance premiums down, monitor petulant employees and keep intruders out.

But the new genre of video cameras now coming out of the labs do a lot more than that. They're intelligent. They can recognize faces, motion, and other interesting characteristics. In fact, they behave a lot like a human eye, with intelligent preprocessor abilities.

Intelligent cameras are needed because a security guard or cop can't monitor the dozens or hundreds of video cameras in a large facility (or dozens of satellite video surveillance channels). Intelligent cameras use artificial intelligence-based object and motion recognition. They scan for what a trained security guard looks for: certain motions, clothing, faces; the presence of people in off-limits places. Instead of watching 100 cameras, only a few at any time send pictures. A single guard or a computer can deal with that.

In face, a steady data stream from multiple intelligent cameras can be uploaded to computerized monitoring facilities anywhere, coupled with other automated observation systems.

The next big thing in intelligent cameras will be "contentaddressable" imagery. That means they'll automatically detect the content of sophisticated patterns, like a specific person's face by matching it against a digital "wanted" poster, say. New software that can even run on chap personal computers makes that possible. MatchMaker from Iterated Systems (Norcross, GA), for example, uses a fractal algorithm that converts image data into mathematical form, automatically recognizing and categorizing realtime "targets" untouched by human hands and tied into a centralized monitoring facility!

A related technology called focal plane array sensors (FPA) discriminates objects at just about any distance. FPA makes it possible to use neuromorphic sensors, modeled biologically on the human eye, which are built into a camera to recognize a person or object by "associative cognition."

CArver Mead at Cal Tech has designed a broad-spectrum "human-eye" sensor using FPAs and 3D artificial neural network processors. To prove the viability of such concepts, Raytheon, under contract with the Guided Interceptor Branch of the Air Force at Elgin AFB, has developed "smart eyes" using FPAs for recognizing objects in flight, thus relieving the pilot of visual target recognition tasks while in a high-pressure combat situation.

This technology is inexpensive, easily reproducible, and will be part of standard equipment for fully automated, on-site visual and infrared surveillance in the near future.

Langley Research Center (Hampton, VA) in conjunction with Telerobotics International (Knoxville, TN) is taking a step further. They're developing an advanced surveillance camera system that's even more intelligent: it uses self aiming and analyzes motion or other parameters. A fisheye spherical lens views a very wide field of vision while a self-contained image processing subsystem tracks several moving targets at once in real time. Video for suspect targets can be transmitted in real time to a security center.

These smart cameras are also getting incredibly tiny and low cost. The Imputer from VLSI Vision Ltd. (Edinburgh, Scotland) is a credit card-sized device that fits in the palm of your hand. It consists of a complete CCD video camera mounted on a circuit board plus an on-board DSP (digital signal processing) coprocessor for realtime image enhancement, feature detection, correlation and convolution (for fast analysis on the fly), and even an optional library of pre-stored feature data so that the camera can independently recognize a specific face or other security-oriented data. It can also download its captured visual data via telephone line to a data collection and processing facility.

With everything on a few chips, intelligent cameras can now be mass-manufactured like pocket radios. No need for security personnel-they can be linked to a computer surveillance monitoring and data base system.

This is where it gets really insidious. When the technology becomes so cheap, tiny, and powerful, and no guards are needed, they can sprinkle these things around like corn chips...secretly putting them on every street corner, in every waiting room, office, wherever.

Keep smiling, because you'll never know when you're on candid camera. And hey, relax, they've just captured your surfaces.

BIOMETRICS

Where it really starts to get hairy is when we enter the brave new world of Biometrics. Biometrics is the process of gathering biological information and converting it into data that can be uploaded into automated systems for identifying you.

They can use your fingerprint (via automated fingerprint identification systems), retinal scan, voice or other personal signatures. Miros of Wellesley, MA has recently introduced a system called Face-to-Face, using neural nets, that is particularly insidious. Unlike fingerprint or palm recognition, it identifies your face "non-intrusively" (that's technospeak for surreptitiously) with 99% recognition. It can even identify your face when you add glasses or change your hairstyle.

There are biometric service bureaus like TRW that provide immediate access to personal dossier information to prisons, banks, military bases, research facilities, pharmaceutical companies, etc. The client simply installs a retinal scanner or other device and transmits your image to a service bureau, which sends back your complete dossier. This is big business for these service bureaus. We're talking billions in government and corporate contracts.

What's next? We can expect intelligent scanning systems will be installed in supermarket checkout lines, lobbies, airports, stores, ATM sites, and so on in the near future. Known shoplifters will be tracked from the time they walk into the store. There'll be a cordon sanitaire around playgrounds and day care centers.

What happens when the FBI ties its fingerprint verification system at its National Criminal Information Center, with its library of over 250,000 fingerprints, into the national health care card system, employment ID card, IRS, and just about everything else?

If the FBI has you listed as a radical or some other species of undesirable, will they be automatically notified whenever you appear at a doctor's office? Every time you use an ATM? What about when you buy a naughty magazine or subscribe to a "politically incorrect" publication? Where does this stuff stop?

Satellite Surveillance

It doesn't. You image may be up for sale right now. Ten-meter resolution satellite images of those strange weeds in your back yard are available to any buyer from the French company SPOT Image of Reston, Virginia.

Even sharper images are available. Spy satellite images at two meters resolution are now available from World Map. About 30 other countries-particularly Germany, Israel, and China-are planning to launch satellite surveillance systems.

Producers of satellite and surveillance equipment and large database processing services like TRW have huge financial stakes in this $8 billion market. They've put massive pressure on the CIA and DoD to loosen up control of satellite surveillance technology. Three of them-Lockheed, Orbital Sciences(which is launching Eyeglass), and World View-are launching satellites with resolutions from one to three meters by 1997.

Another recently-formed U.S. company, Teledesic, is planning a vast $9 billion global communication system using 840 geosynchronous orbit satellites, scheduled for 2001. There would be no single area on the planet that could not be "seen" on demand, and more importantly, virtually all digital communications could be linked through this universal transponder system.

Suddenly we're just one step from a universal monitoring system. The satellites could conceivably serve as platforms for multi-spectra, on-demand, visual and IR surveillance of any coordinate on the planetary surface. Note: both founders of Teledesic, Bill Gates and Craig McCaw, declined to be interviewed by MONDO on this topic.

ROBOT SPIES

Unmanned robotic devices (airborne and land-based) are now here that can observe an individual or dwelling day or night from a distance. They can also monitor communications (using RF signatures) over a broad spectrum of frequencies. They can be activated from a distant control center thousands of miles away from the target; and surveillance data can be collected and examined in real time via satellite link.

For example, there's the SR2 Security Robot System from Cybermotion Inc. of Roanoke, Virginia. Designed to "replace human security personnel," the SR2 patrols a region of up 15 square miles for 12 hour shifts (between charges), using ultrasonic, optical, and infrared sensors plus onboard "fuzzy logic" to navigate around complex obstacles and interpret data. An operator at a remote site controls and interacts with a group of these robots via bidirectional RF data links.

There's also NASA's High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) unmanned aircraft. HALE can stay airborne for days at a time, carrying CCD optical and infrared camera systems. These lightweight stealth aircraft are flown by remote control, using satellite data links to an operational command center that can be thousands of miles away. Perfect for kamikaze-style strikes.

And the U.S. Navy is soliciting proposals to develop a robotic, flyable platform for optical and infrared surveillance, designed for "riot control, border surveillance, and personnel detection."

A fuzzy logic based RF communications signal/signature analysis system has been solicited by the U.S. Navy. It will be able to recognize the content of any transmitted signal from anywhere, regardless of spread spectrum, encryption, or other electronic signal countermeasures. Commercial applications cited in the solicitation are "law enforcement, surveillance, drug interdiction, illegal immigrant control, etc."

Real time monitoring by these robotic devices can be remotely activated from anywhere. No search warrants, no court authorizations.

MASSIVELY PARALLEL COMPUTERS AND OPTICAL STORAGE

All these surveillance systems generate massive amounts of information. Until recently this would have been impractical for millions of people.

Currently, massive optical data storage technologies coupled with extremely powerful, massively parallel processing computers are capable of very high-volume data storage and very high-speed data analysis.

The Department of Commerce is financing a joint project with Tamarack Storage Devices to develop a photorefractive holographic data storage system capable of handling hundreds of terabytes (that's 10^12thpower bytes) of data for extremely large database processing operations. This is exactly the type of information storage/processing capability required for a nationwide population monitoring system. Thinking Machines Inc., of Cambridge, MA has recently announced a massively parallel processing supercomputer, the CM-5, specifically designed for extremely huge data base processing applications. It can access an astonishing 3.2 terabytes of data with a bandwidth of up to 4.2 gigabytes per second, distributed over a network of 16,000 processing nodes that can be located anywhere.

A handful of these systems can maintain an up-to-date population monitoring/data processing system for the entire country.

What do you think is going to be in that secret $350 million National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO) building in CHantilly, VA? Hint: They're not watching Russia any more.

NEURAL NETS AND AI

Of course, all these operations normally require huge staffs of trained experts. That's where neural nets and artificial intelligence come in. Neural net processing systems can search for "behavioral tendencies" within a database and automatically flag certain individuals for surveillance and "attention" from interested enforcement agencies, employers, political researchers, etc. This is a rung up from knowbots and gobots.

A good example is the ominous Origin system (the U.S. base is Tampa, FL), a worldwide realtime, intelligent vision processing and networking database system designed for "intelligent security database monitoring and observation" for law enforcement and government agencies. It used Iterated Systems' Matchmaker software running on a global computer network. A surveillance camera or biometric sensor anywhere can feed signals into the network and get back a name of the person in seconds.

HNC's (San Diego, CA) DataBase Mining Workstation is a dedicated neural network processing engine designed to look for "interesting" data sets on its own. The user "trains" the system for topics or features of interest. Once effectively trained, the system automatically tracks anything (or anyone) that gets its attention and draws its own conclusions.

HNC also sells the Falcon neural net credit card "fraud and abuse" detection system. It automatically "learns" about unusual spending habits and related behavioral feature sets. Clients for this system include AT&T, Colonial National Bank, Eurocard Netherlands, First USA Bank, Household Credit Services, and Wells Fargo Bank. HNC is also working on credit risk evaluation, bankruptcy potential, and other forms of financial activity pattern recognition.

Again, no need for pesky humans who can be held accountable for violation of privacy. "The machine did it!" Once this becomes routine, current legally-defined barriers to privacy disappear totally.

AUTOMATED VOICE RECOGNITION

In the good old days, they had to attach electronic clips to your phone and get court authorization. Not so today.

Let's say you're on a list somewhere based on your politics, reading, or drug, or sexual habits. Zap: you're suddenly on a priority list for surveillance. You make a call and your voice matches the profile. The system starts to listen in to your vocal communications in real time. The voice data can then be digitized, stored, and added to your surveillance dossier by the computer.

If you've seen the movie Clear and Present Danger, you know how easily intelligence agencies monitor cellular phone calls, satellite phone calls, and anything else that's broadcast. (It's actually easy for anyone to monitor cellular calls with a scanner covering 870 to 896 MHz or a UHF TV receiver tuned to channels 80 to 83 and a good UHF antenna.) Then they digitize speech signals and convert them into text data, which can then be processed to search for specific words or phrases.

All this will be a lot easier when the telephone companies introduce Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) communications in a few years. Virtually all communications, including data transmission and business and personal phone calls will be routed through the same universal communication channel, making the job of listening in much easier.

Dialogic Corp. (Parsippany, NJ) is developing "second generation" modular telephone call-processing and automated speech recognition system hardware and software. Uses include online automatic keyword and phrase recognition. That is, any word or word combination that may be "interesting" to an automated listening system can cue automated storage of an entire conversation for further analysis.

The Sprint voice-activated phone card is already in use. But several corporations including TRW have already taken it a step further. They can analyze and store voice signatures for every telephone caller in the country for a much larger market: voice recognition for phone credit card verification and voice-triggered ID security systems. Essentially, you'll be forced to use voice ID or no credit or access. It's a simple matter to adapt this kind of technology for a national tracking system.

The U.S. Navy wants to take it a step further. As evidenced by its recent FY 94 "Global Surveillance and Communications" technology solicitations (as per the SBIR development funding program), they are developing a "robust signal processing of speech" capability with "voice communications countermeasures and counter-countermeasures" as part of a comprehensive, speech recognition and processing system.

Sun Microsystems workstations include a microphone and speech recognition chip. A recent security alert from the Computer Emergency Response Team at Carnegie Mellon University disclosed that the workstations had been pre-programmed with a "world readable" status feature. That means any of these networked workstations could in fact serve as a remotely-monitored microphone. A back door has already been built into this workstation. That means anyone can activate the microphone to listen in remotely from anywhere in the world.

DESKTOP NSA

But all this massive power is not limited to giant computer centers. Even desktop computers are now becoming powerful enough to handle massive amounts of intelligence information.

Adaptive Solutions Inc. (Beaverton, OR) sells a $7000 CNAPS/PC board that converts a 486 or Pentium computer into a massively parallel processing engine. The boards, each of which contains 128 processors, perform 2.56 billion multiply/accumulate operations per second. This means a 1000 times performance improvement in pattern recognition.

Companies are turning these powerful new surveillance tools on their own people too. For example, Microsoft has a secret project to monitor all keystrokes of its personnel to "improve efficiency" using neural net and artificial intelligence software. And Edify Corp. (Santa Clara, CA) is supplying "intelligent agent" software to BellSouth Communications Systems (Roanoke, VA). It will be built into BellSouth's Electronic Workforce software. Its customers will use it for interactive voice response and recognition, personnel and client workforce screening, efficiency monitoring, and workflow automation.

PROBATION NATION

This is NOT another paranoid "1984" scenario based on some futuristic fantasy. For the first time in history, the technology is available to design and implement such a ubiquitous surveillance/monitoring system. This crisis climate created by the media-particularly television "news magazines"-is being used to mandate this horror.

The political will to do this is here and it is being touted as an acceptable solution to such problems as crime and illegal immigrants. The general public is not even remotely familiar with the technical details of how such a repressive system could be implemented and won't wake up until they're virtual prisoners in a totally automated Surveillance Society.

RESOURCE LIST:

Complied by Sylvia Tan

Who Owns Information? From Privacy to Public Access, anne Wells Branscomb, Basic BOoks, 1994.

Deep Black: Space Espionage and National Security, William E. Burrows, Random House, New York, 1986.

The Electronic Eye-The Rise of Surveillance Society, David Lyon, University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

Tuning in to Scanning-From Police to Satellite Bands, Bob Kay, TAB Books, 1994. How to listen in on cordless telephones, military, FBI, Secret Service, and NASA communications.

Undercover: Police Surveillance in America, Gary T. Marx, University of California Press, 1988.

Privacy for Sale: How Computerization Has Made Everyone's Private Life an Open Secret, Jeffery Rothfeder, Simon and Schuster, 1992.

America's Secret Eyes in Space: The U.S. Keyhole Spy Satellite Program, Jeffery T. Richelson, Harper & Row, 1990.

Hobbyist's Guide to COMINT Collection and Analysis, Tom Roach, 1330 Copper Peak Lane, San Jose, CA 95120-4271. DIY dirty NSA-style tricks.

"Communications and Computer Surveillance, Privacy, and Security," U.S. Congress House Committee on Science, Space, and TEchnology, Environment, and Aviation, U.S.G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., COngressional Sales Office, 1994.

Electronic Surveillance Manual, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division, Office of Enforcement Operations, 1991.

"Improved surveillance is possible by combining data from different systems," David Diez, ICAO Journal Vol. 48. no. 2, Mar. 1993

"Strategic Satellite Systems in a Post-Cold War Environment," United States Congress House Committee on Government Operations Legislation and National Security Subcommittee, U.S.G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales